Friday, March 01, 2013

No Privilege

Friday, March 1, 2013 -- Week of Lent 2 (Year One)
David, Bishop of Menevia, Wales, c. 544

[Go to http://www.missionstclare.com/english/index.html for an online version of the Daily Office including today's scripture readings.]

Today's Readings for the Daily Office

     (Book of Common Prayer, p. 952)
Psalms        69:1-23(24-30)31-38 (morning)     //       73 (evening)
Jeremiah 5:1-9
Romans 2:25 - 3:18
John 5:30-47

Paul's argument in the early chapters of Romans has been to assert that there is no moral advantage for the religious over the non-religious.  (He speaks of the Jew and the Gentile; the analogy seems to read better in our culture if we read it the Christian and the non-Christian.)  If a religious person acts unjustly or unethically, that person has no privilege before God just because that person is a believer.  If a non-religious person acts justly and ethically, that person is acceptable before God despite having no religious conviction or a different religious belief.  Paul's purpose is to challenge those who believe their religious belief and practice gives them privileged standing.  He challenges them especially when they fail to live up to their highest religious values.

Ultimately all need God's compassion.  That's where Paul is headed.  And God's compassionate love and acceptance -- God's grace -- is a gift freely given, not an accomplishment to be earned through religious practice or through moral exercise.  "There is no one who is righteous, not even one."  It is important to recognize that Paul's primary target for this charge was the religious person.  It was those who conscientiously observed the moral religious laws who believed themselves to have standing before God.  No, says Paul.  No standing.  You have failed.  But happy failure!  Your failure has opened up the door of fellowship with God's people to the Gentile non-believers.  Look what good God can accomplish through our failure.

Jeremiah strikes a similar theme.  He runs through the streets of Jerusalem and cannot find a single person "who acts justly and seeks truth."  They are religious people -- they say, "As the Lord lives..."  But rich and poor alike have proved unfaithful.  His indictment of the rich is particularly vivid:  "When I fed them to the full, they committed adultery and trooped to the houses of prostitutes.  They were well-fed lusty stallions, each neighing for his neighbor's wife."  Such a culture cannot stand.  Their nation's destruction, seen by Jeremiah as punishment from God, is inevitable.

In John's gospel we find Jesus engaged in a similar dispute.  He is speaking to religious people "who search the scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life."  Yet these are exactly the people who are challenging and rejecting him.  The poor and the non-observant accept Jesus and his gentle ministry of healing, compassion and forgiveness.  But those who have studied the scriptures do not accept him.

It is easy to understand why the Biblically literate did not accept him.  Jesus did not fulfill many of the Messianic expectations.  He did not come with power to restore Israel by violence and force.  That's what the Bible-people expected.  They still do.  Jesus did fulfill the scriptures, but only those that were oriented toward healing, compassion, reconciliation and forgiveness.  That wasn't good enough for the religious.  Jesus tells them that the source of their hope will accuse them.   Moses and the scriptures will accuse them for missing God's visitation in the unexpected one.

These are strong Lenten cautions for all of us who call ourselves religious.  We have no privilege because of our religion.  We are not better because of our belief.  There is goodness and godliness present in the non-religious and other-faithed person.  God comes to us in the unexpected one.  Our theological presumptions, even when founded on the scripture, can be wrong or shortsighted.  We all need God's compassionate mercy.  We're all in the same boat, believer and non-believer alike.  So, we can be modest and gracious, especially toward the ethical person whose belief is different from ours.  We can be open and expectant that God will continue to surprise us by bringing blessing from the unexpected ones.


Lowell
___________



Audio podcast:  Listen to an audio podcast of the most recent Morning Reflections from today and the past week.  Go to: http://www.stpaulsfay.org/id244.html

About Morning Reflections
"Morning Reflections" is a brief thought about the scripture readings from the Daily Office of Morning and Evening Prayer according to the practice found in the Book of Common Prayer of the Episcopal Church.

Morning Prayer begins on p. 80 of the Book of Common Prayer.
Evening Prayer begins on p. 117
An online resource for praying the Daily Office is found at http://www.missionstclare.com/english/index.html

Another form of the office from Phyllis Tickle's "Divine Hours" is available on our partner web site www.ExploreFaith.org at this location

The Mission of St. Paul's Episcopal Church
is to explore and celebrate
God's infinite grace, acceptance, and love.

See our Web site at www.stpaulsfay.org

Our Rule of Life: 
We aspire to...
    worship weekly
    pray daily
    learn constantly
    serve joyfully 
    live generously.

Lowell Grisham, Rector
St. Paul's Episcopal Church
Fayetteville, Arkansas

2 Comments:

At 3:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm going to try again to post a comment. I've not had very good luck lately. This is a reflection that really resonates with me. I want to pass it on to a friend who is "religious" and condeming at the same time. I'll probably not do that as my time is better spent looking inward to see if my promptings and opinions are the same as hers. Probably a better Lenten use of time than trying to change someone else....Caroline

 
At 4:51 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Lowell,

And I think about the Head Start program cuts, the WIC program cuts, Medicaid cuts. These are our most vulnerable populations, the poor, elderly and disabled, women and children at the lowest end of the economic spectrum. How can we justify balancing a budget by taking away the little bit of help that served to begin to balance the power and economic differentials in our society. And my representative, representing the poorest county in Washington state thinks it was a good idea. Who he is representing is not the working poor, the single parent, the poorest children. Would that those in positions of power would vote considering the "least of these". That should be a deciding factor in all their discussions and voting. It is the only way to begin to form a "more perfect union". And I think about what Jesus might say..

Peace,
Janet

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home