Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Meat Sacrificed to Idols

Wednesday, February 27, 2008 -- Week of 3 Lent
(George Herbert, Priest, 1633)

Today's Readings for the Daily Office (Book of Common Prayer, p. 955)
Psalms 119:97-120 (morning) 81, 82(evening)
Genesis 45:16-28
1 Corinthians 8:1-13
Mark 6:13-29

For Paul it is important that love be our primary motivation. Love is more important than knowledge; more important than freedom. We are to use our knowledge and freedom in the service of love. We are to forego what we know and limit our freedom if it is more loving to do so.

The presenting issue is food sacrificed to idols. Among the gentile converts, this issue was a big deal. Paul's solution is characteristic of his ethic and gospel.

Much of the meat sold in the public markets in the Roman world was blessed at a local Temple to Apollo or other Roman gods as part of the ritual offerings. The entrails or organs were the useful religious parts; the edible parts were to be shared with the priests and others, sometimes in a holy meal. The animals offered for sacrifice would be examined for flaws or blemishes and certified as perfect or excellent. Meat blessed at the Temple would be valued meat.

To Paul, life in Christ made all of this stuff meaningless. Rituals and sacrifices and laws have no significance for him. Christ has made all things new. The gift of life in Christ is the gift of freedom. We have been made Christ's own, reconciled to God completely through the generous act of Christ. He had no scruples about meat sacrificed to idols. It's good meat; eat it, and enjoy.

But there are some who have not come to the fullness of this freedom. He calls them our weaker brothers and sisters. Out of regard for them, we should be willing to limit our freedom rather than harm their conscience. If they think the meat sacrificed to idols has some significance, is a participation in the worship of the other gods, then he would abstain from eating such meats as an act of loving respect toward them.

Some applications are obvious. Don't have pork ribs when you are at a restaurant with an observant Jew; order tea when visiting with someone in recovery; don't cuss in front of your mother.

This is a passage that is being urged upon the Episcopal Church with regard to our relationship with our brothers and sisters in regions of the world where gay people are regarded as immoral or sick. For the sake of their conscience, we should forgo our freedom to recognize ritually the holiness of gay unions. I find that application problematic, since it perpetuates injustice and violence toward my gay brothers and sisters. I would refrain from blessing gay unions in the diocese of Rwanda, but here where we recognize the holiness of such love, I would bless freely -- something like Paul enjoying idol meat in his private home but restraining if with a new and scrupulous gentile convert.

When is it right to limit our freedom for the sake of another's scruples, superstition, or ignorance? That's the question Paul presents us. He's obviously encouraging generosity toward the weaker neighbor, in a spirit of love and respect. But Paul has his boundaries too. He fiercely opposed those Jewish-Christians whose conscience was offended by the presence of Greek-Christian brothers who were uncircumcised. The connection between circumcision and bondage to the law was too critical. For me the connection between oppression and violence toward gay people and their denial of blessing is too critical.

What about our weaker brothers who fear that Darwin's evolutionary theory will unseat God? Or those who fear everyone who has not followed some public script about Jesus will go to hell? What about our brothers and sisters who believe a fertilized egg is fully comparable to a living, breathing human being? ...those of us whose conscience is offended when we execute someone who is in prison and completely in our control. ...or those who believe torture is always wrong?

I'm not sure how my logic is holding up here, but I know that these conflicts between love and freedom and knowledge are complicated and always with us. Paul invites us to elevate love to such a degree that when it is necessary, we should be willing to limit our freedom. It is a harder moral equation when someone's scruple demands we limit another's freedom, and it is always complicated when we must judge between competing loves.


Audio podcast: Listen to an audio podcast of the most recent Morning Reflections from today and the past week. Click the following link: Morning Reflection Podcasts

About Morning Reflections
Morning Reflections is a brief thought about the scripture readings from the Daily Office of Morning and Evening Prayer according to the practice found in the Book of Common Prayer of the Episcopal Church.

Morning Prayer begins on p. 80 of the Book of Common Prayer.
Evening Prayer begins on p. 117

An online resource for praying the Daily Office is found at
Another form of the office from Phyllis Tickle's "Divine Hours" is available on our partner web site at this location --

The Mission of St. Paul's Episcopal Church
is to explore and celebrate
God's infinite grace, acceptance, and love.

Visit our web site at

Our Rule of Life
We aspire to...
worship weekly
pray daily
learn constantly
serve joyfully
live generously.

Lowell Grisham, Rector
St. Paul's Episcopal Church
Fayetteville, Arkansas


At 3:23 PM, Blogger The Underground Pewster said...

Why not bless polygamy? Why don't we just simplify things and do away with marriage, SSUs, and create "Committed Friendship blessings" (CFB's)? And that does not stand for college football. If interpersonal love is the expression of the divine in this life, the more the merrier! (or would that be "marryher"


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home